Send in the Song-and-Dance Gal

Posted on January 27th, 2010 by admin  |  No Comments »


ON screen Catherine Zeta-Jones has been a famous smoulderer, a one-woman heat source. When Antonio Banderas unfastens her bodice in “The Mask of Zorro” — the 1998 movie that introduced her to most Americans, including her husband, Michael Douglas — you feel he ought to be wearing oven mitts. Watching her slither in her jewel-thief cat suit in “Entrapment” (1999), Sean Connery visibly liquefies.

It was this quality, the sultry glamour she brings even to cellphone ads, that Trevor Nunn had in mind when he cast her as Desiree, her first Broadway role, in his revival of “A Little Night Music,” which also stars Angela Lansbury and Alexander Hanson and opens at the Walter Kerr Theater on Dec. 13. For good measure she has been equipped with a fiery red wig, and when she makes her first sustained appearance, performing in a little snippet of play within the play, it’s as if a gas jet had suddenly flared.

“A Little Night Music,” with music and lyrics by Stephen Sondheim and a book by Hugh Wheeler, is in large part about aging and mortality, and traditionally the part of Desiree, a famous actress at a turning point in her career, has gone to someone older than Ms. Zeta-Jones, who is 40 but looks younger. Glynis Johns was 49 when she created the role on Broadway and gave the part a hint of someone clinging to her past.

But Mr. Nunn said recently that a noticeably younger, sexier Desiree was important to his conception of the show, which ended its acclaimed London run in July. He went back to the source of “A Little Night Music,” the Ingmar Bergman film “Smiles of a Summer Night” (1955), and there, he said, the Desiree “is a wonderfully glamorous actress — you’d say she was 39 or so.”

He added: “Everything of course makes sense when that’s the age group. She’s at the point where she has to decide whether she still wants to be living out of a suitcase or whether she wants a life that’s more settled. But Desiree is pretty much the sex symbol of her age. She’s on all the posters, the text says. She’s Hedda Gabler, she’s Nora in ‘A Doll’s House.’ She’s an actress who plays roles where the sensibility is sexual and glamorous.”

The other thing Mr. Nunn knew about Ms. Zeta-Jones, besides her glamour and sexiness, was that she was, as he put it, a “song and dance girl, a real theater animal.” For most Americans her Oscar-winning performance as the vamping, song-belting Velma Kelly in “Chicago” was a revelation, but in fact she grew up in the musical theater, and movie stardom came her way somewhat by accident. At 22 she was cast as a lead in “The Darling Buds of May,” a British mini-series, and overnight became so popular that, as she said, laughing, “I could never ride the Underground again.”

Mr. Nunn recalled auditioning Ms. Zeta Jones, then 18 or 19, for a part in the Andrew Lloyd-Webber musical “Aspects of Love.” “I was tremendously impressed, but she was slightly older than the role called for.”

“He wrote me a letter,” Ms. Zeta-Jones, who in person is warm (but not scorching) and unpretentious, said last week over brunch on the Upper West Side. “He said, ‘You did a wonderful audition, but you’re too pretty for the role.’ ”

She laughed and added, “I’d take that any day now, but at the time. …” She shook her head and used an un-newspaperlike expression, giving it a little Welsh emphasis. These days Ms. Zeta-Jones, who grew up in Mumbles, a little town outside Swansea, has pretty much tamped down her accent, except when talking to her mother, and then, according to her husband, the two of them sound as if they’re not even speaking English.

Recalling her teenage years in London, Ms. Zeta-Jones said: “I was a chorus girl. That’s all I ever wanted — to be onstage. I would queue up for auditions and then change my costume or put on a different leotard and audition again. It might take me two tries, but I always got the job. I figured out what they wanted.”

When Ms. Zeta-Jones was 5, her mother sent her to the Hazel Johnson School of Dancing, in the church hall just down the street, to channel her energy. At 9 she won a nationwide audition for “Annie,” and moved to London with a chaperone and a tutor. “I loved it.” she said. “I loved everything about it.” At 11 she was a British tap-dancing champion, and at 19, cast as an understudy, she took over the lead in a West End production of “42nd Street.”

Almost ever since, she said, and especially after “Chicago,” she has wanted to return to the stage, but for one reason or another the right part never came along. She was hitting golf balls on a driving range in Canada last summer when Mr. Nunn called about “A Little Night Music.”

“He said, ‘Darling, I’d love you to do this, but I’m afraid I can’t use your dancing,’ ” she recalled. “I said, ‘Not even a split, not even a jeté?’ ”

She added: “There’s no jazzy hands, no high kicks, no fishnet stockings, but really that’s what excited me. With most musicals you have to fill in the gaps, but here you have what’s already a beautiful Chekhovian play, and the music is a bonus. The characterization is everything. It’s not one of those shows where you can dig about three inches and come out the other end. You can keep digging and digging and digging.”

Except for some waltzing, nobody in “A Little Night Music” dances much, and Desiree, though the center of the story, doesn’t even sing as much as some of the others. She has one big number, which happens to be the only one that has escaped from the orbit of the show: “Send In the Clowns.” Even people who have never even heard of “A Little Night Music” know the Frank Sinatra version, the Barbra Streisand version, the Judy Collins version.

Mr. Nunn compared it to the “To be or not to be” soliloquy in “Hamlet.” “The first thing people say when they get to theater is ‘Oh, I wonder what he’ll do with “To be or not to be,” ’ ” he said. “They forget that it’s just a speech in context.”

The same is true with “Send In the Clowns,” he went on. “It’s not a torch song, it’s not a stand-and-deliver. It’s a song very much in context, and you have to be truthful with it. What you mustn’t do is say to yourself, ‘I’ve got to knock people’s socks off, bring the house down.’ ” He added: “If people are going to hang on it and insist on making comparisons, there’s just nothing you can do about that.”

Ms. Zeta-Jones said Mr. Sondheim had advised her, “Just speak it.” She doesn’t do that, exactly, but her version is low and thoughtful, full of regrets and second thoughts.

“As an actor what do you do?” she said. “You try to make it your own.” She deliberately didn’t listen to any other versions, she added, just as she had made a point of not seeing “Chicago” before acting in it. “It was never supposed to be a big song,” she said. “It’s very intimate, about a woman being told that she’s not going to be with the love of her life. How are you supposed to sing when you’re that deflated?”

Elsewhere in the show Ms. Zeta-Jones invests her part with a trouper’s energy and a joyful theatricality that’s appropriate for Desiree but may also be autobiographical. “I’m just so happy to be there,” she said after explaining that because of Hollywood economics she wasn’t seeing many interesting movie parts these days.

“I’d read the phone book with the people here, people of this caliber,” she said. “I feel at this point in my life I’m in my second chapter. You have to be quite frank with yourself. There’s that wonderful curve, and then this is the way it is: the second act. It’s great that now I can go back to my roots but in a completely different way.”

Avatar 2010

Posted on January 24th, 2010 by admin  |  No Comments »

James Cameron writes solid—not surprising—scripts. Spoiler alert! In Titanic, the ship sinks; the real drama happens in the small moments that happen before, during and after. Avatar is both incredibly predictable and incredibly perverse. Not only does Cameron blur the line between reality and CGI, he’s at once jingoistic and anti-hawk. Right-wingers will feel welcomed in the first half, the left-brained will be vindicated by the climax. But both groups will pony up buckets of cash to see what pledged to be—and is—the spectacle of the year, and even just shy of three hours it’s a hell of a lot more whiz-bang fun than bread and circuses.

Though Cameron’s reputation is for decadence, his stories are always grippingly elemental. Here, we have a crippled ex-Marine named Jake (Sam Worthington, dull but serviceable) asked to take his dead twin brother’s role in an expensive and dangerous genetic experiment. His brother spent three years earning a PhD in the language and culture of the Na’vi, a slender, strong, long-tailed blue alien culture that’s learned to survive on the violently beautiful planet of Pandora. From space, Pandora looks a lot like earth. Up close it does too, but the resemblance clearest in the mining regions that the U.S. Military (now merged with the economy) has trampled with 10-story bulldozers. Through a biological link, Jake can step into his brother’s shoes (or really, bare feet) as an operator of a Na’vi spawned in a lab from his brother’s DNA.

Jake isn’t an anthropologist; he’s a moron. And if you think I’m being cruel, that’s literally his sole defining trait (and nickname) in the movie’s first third. He’s a headstrong, self-described jarhead dying to regain the use of his legs, even if those legs are 7 feet long, alien and blue. So what Cameron gives us is a boy who simply wants to run, thrown onto a planet where three groups battle for his heart and mind: Sigourney Weaver’s bio-cultural researcher (his ostensible boss), Stephen Lang and Giovanni Ribisi as the initially charming military-industrialists (and Jake’s real bosses) who want Jake to infiltrate the Na’vi and kick them off their land and Zoe Saldana as the Na’vi princess Neytiri who slowly falls in love with this idiot that both her parents and her land have asked her to protect. This heedless jock just might be crucial to her culture’s survival. Okay, fine, he is. But as always with Cameron, the film’s destination isn’t his goal.

Both Lang and Ribisi are trying to mine a mineral Cameron bluntly calls ‘unobtanium’ from underneath the Na’vi capital. Priced at $20 million a kilo, it’s the sole motive behind earth’s invasion of Pandora. Even before they grunt buzzwords like “shock and awe” and “preemptive attack,” this is clearly a three-year, $300 million rebuke of Dick Cheney. (And if that price tag sounds outrageous, it’s the cost of one day of the ongoing War on Terror.)

Though it’s set in 2154, Cameron’s flick is so set in the present, it’s actually set in the past. Characters even reference jujubees and Ranger Rick—things that were practically extinct two decades ago. When Ribisi exclaims, “Look at that cheddar!” he sounds like Jay-Z circa 2001. The Na’vi are untouched by the rappers of the 21st century, but their lines are lifted from centuries of Buddhist texts about respecting the cyclical energy of life and death—stuff Ribisi dismisses as “tree hugger crap.” Eventually, we learn that all the trees on the Internet are connected through their roots like a shared brain—or really, tree Internet—and Cameron pans across them (and watches their destruction) with reverence, a palpable love he also extends to the bioluminescent ground, the thickets of motion-sensing ferns, the humid air, the clouds of insects, down even to the dirt which the newly mobile Jake curls his toes into and sighs.

Cameron wants us to appreciate the world he’s toiled to make. And it’s beautiful. His Pandora is a revelation—truly a must see. (Suspect anyone who claims to be underwhelmed—they’re jaded beyond hope.) But Cameron knows to give us long tracking shots that show off his creation instead of chopping it into a frenzy. Instead, he holds steady and piles it on, cramming casual moments like Jake and Neytiri hiking through the forest with details that fill every inch of the frame: the glowing moon, the swaying breeze, the humming flies, the dense leaves. You could say Cameron suffocates us with his enthusiasm, except he does so in a way that makes us want to come back for more.

Maybe it’s because we’re so agog at Avatar’s beauty that it takes us a few beats to realize Cameron’s slowly switched the game on us. Sure, the Na’vi kill for food and freedom, but they take lives with respect. (Well, at least the lives of their food.) We, like Jake, are seduced by the group’s humility in the face of every organism’s right to live. But we’re also on a planet heading towards war, where the metal death machines of the U.S. goliaths prepare to trample an indigenous people even though they’ve been warned the Na’vi alone are masters of the mountains, jungles and climate. (And you know that’s never an easy route.)

Lang considers Worthington a traitor to his race. In a gleeful if incidental pun he accuses his soldier of abandoning his principles for “some local tail.” His ladylove is brandishing a hell of a non-hensile posterior. I found Saldana’s Neytiri a little too hippie and sinuous to equal the best of Cameron’s ass-kicking femmes—by contrast, Sigourney looks killer even wearing a cardigan and pearls.

Through Neytiri’s love for her planet, Avatar treats the death of a space coyote with the respect given Hamlet’s mother. It also wastes the lives of thousands of Na’vi and Earthlings as easily as crumpled tissues. You can call that hypocrisy. Or you can look at the uncanny insight of Cameron’s other works and ask yourself what he’s up to? I think it’s underestimating Cameron to claim he’s unaware of the central contradiction of his ecological blockbuster. He’s set up a conflict where he asks us to identify with the aliens killing people with arrows. Are we not men? We are. And we’ve been primed to feel the moral weight of death on both sides. (There’s even a burning, six-legged, space horse straight out of Guernica.) If we’ve managed to keep our brains screwed on through all the stunning visuals, we’re not going to check them when the first bombs go off. And that this applause-worthy battle keeps its feet on the ground (even when its fighters are on starships and dragons) is a feat bested only by its damn gorgeousness.

Distributor: 20th Century Fox
Cast: Sam Worthington, Sigourney Weaver, Zoe Saldana, Stephen Lang, Joel David Moore, CCH Pounder, Wes Studi, Giovanni Ribisi and Michelle Rodriguez
Director/Screenwriter: James Cameron
Producers: James Cameron and Jon Landau
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Rating: PG-13 for intense epic battle sequences and warfare, sensuality, language and some smoking.
Running time: 161 min.
Release date: December 18, 2009